Seven days ago I announced I would be authoring a post on alcohol. I didn’t expect much response (at least not until I published the post), but within a few minutes of tweeting that announcement I was getting responses on both Twitter and Facebook. While the response has been all positive, I have discovered that writing the post itself has been more difficult than I ever imagined. I thought I could just outline the three major positions on alcohol in Christianity (moderation, abstention and prohibition), list the scriptures that each position uses for support and debunk any myths fabricated by each position, all while remaining objective and not contributing to the already wide chasm between each group/position.
Simple, right?
Not really.
Because the more I research, the more I realize someone will get offended, which is not my intention. I never set out to please everyone, but I don’t want to alienate people either. As Steven Furtick has said:
“A lot of people like to use the Bible to fight their own individual wars on culture.”
I don’t want to be that guy. My intention is to open up discussion, because I see that lacking in Christianity. So it’ll be a bit longer before you see my post on alcohol and the church. I want to be sure that I write nothing carelessly, no matter how truthful or right it may be, because I would then be no better thanĀ that guy. I’m constantly reminding myself of the following:
“In the essentials we need unity, in the non-essentials we need freedom; but in all things we need love.”
- Rupertus Meldenius