se7en

June 6, 2010 — 0 Comments

It’s Sunday here in the central time zone, so once again here are my favorite posts from the past seven days.

Eric Geiger writes about how typical ministry is actually unbiblical.

Tullian Tchividjian with a great explanation of What the Bible Is Not.

Mars Hill worship pastor Joel Brown lists 3 Priorites When Preparing Music for a worship gathering.

A great question for John Piper’s Ask Pastor John series, What Should We Teach About Creation?

John Piper concludes his twelve post series directed at prosperity preachers. There are links to the other eleven posts at the bottom of the twelfth.

Jason Boyett asks Is the Church the Best Place for Doubters?

I’m a Christian Missionary, an Agnostic Researcher, and an Atheist Professor.

Larry Shallenberger reminds us that the debate on homosexuality should not be stripped of it’s humanity.

Healthy Friends Are Responsible To, Not For, Each Other.

Do you want to change the world because you love it, or because you hate it?

Do we all share responsibility for the BP oil spill?

Matthew Paul Turner asks a very interesting question: What if your name, face, and address were listed by your sin and then put on an iPhone app?

Found “Ark” A Hoax?

April 29, 2010 — 6 Comments

In case you’ve been living under a rock this week, on Tuesday a group calling themselves Noah’s Ark Ministries International announced they were 99.9% sure they had found Noah’s Ark.

Two days later, a former member of their team is claiming hoax.

This post is not meant to argue the validity of the researchers claims, nor is it meant to slander them and call Christians gullible (although I’ve met a few in my lifetime that meet the requirements).

I was reading a post where author Jason Boyett interviewed renowned archaeologist Robert Cargill. Maybe you’ve seen him on History or Discovery, talking about the Bible or debunking aliens.

Anyways, here’s an excerpt:

…the flood is one of the biblical stories that just about everyone has heard, even the non-religious. Thus, if you can find Noah’s Ark, then there must have been a flood, and if there was a flood, then the Bible is historical and true, and if the Bible is historical and true, then why don’t you accept it?

It’s a hoax. We’ll never find Noah’s Ark, the Ark of the Covenant, etc., not only because they may not be historical, but because the ancients were far better recyclers than we are. My Prius and I are no match for ancient recyclers, who would have torn or melted down and reused anything of value, especially wood and gold. Don’t base your faith on relics.

“Don’t base your faith on relics.”

That REALLY spoke to me.

This is just the latest example of people trying to find evidence in order to prove their faith, forgetting the key word there is FAITH.

Time.com posted an article titled Top 10 Religious Relics to coincide with the first public viewings of the Shroud of Turin since 2000.

Whatever happened to the Biblical definition of faith found in Hebrews 11:1?

Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen.

I’m not afraid to say it: I can’t prove there is a God. But I believe He exists.

I can’t prove Jesus Christ is the Son of God. But I believe He is.

I can’t prove that Jesus Christ was resurrected nearly 2,000 years ago. But I believe He was.

I can’t prove the existence of a real Heaven and a real Hell. But I believe they exist.

There’s not a whole lot pertaining to the Christian faith that I can prove. But that’s why it’s called FAITH.

Just my two cents.

For more from Jason Boyett, check out his website and blog.

Resurrection

April 4, 2010 — 0 Comments

Resurrection: Rob Bell from The Work of Rob Bell on Vimeo.

At the heart of the historical Jesus story is the provocative, compelling, subversive, beautiful insistence that nothing can ever be the same again, not after resurrection.

Here’s the transcript from the video:

Jesus is standing in front of the temple in Jerusalem
the massive gleaming brick and stone and gold house of God
and he says destroy this temple
and I’ll rebuild it in three days

the people listening to him said how are you going to do that?
it took 46 years to build this temple!
but he wasn’t talking about that temple
he’s talking about himself
he essentially says, listen
I’m going to be killed
that’s where this is headed
because you don’t confront corrupt systems of power
without paying for it
sometimes with your own blood
and so he’s headed to his execution
if you had witnessed this divine life extinguished on a cross
how would you not be overwhelmed with despair?

is the world ultimately a cold, hard, dead place?

does death have the last word?
is it truly, honestly, actually dark
and so whatever light we do see
whatever good we do stumble upon
are those just blips on the radar?
momentary interruptions in an otherwise meaningless existence?
because if that’s the case then despair is the
only reasonable response

it’s easy to be cynical

but Jesus says destroy this temple and I’ll rebuild it
he insists that his execution would not be the end
he’s talking about something new and unexpected
happening after his death
he’s talking about resurrection

resurrection announces that God has not given up on the world
because this world matters
this world that we call home
dirt and blood and sweat and skin and light and water
this world that God is redeeming and restoring and renewing

greed and violence and abuse they are not right
and they cannot last
they belong to death and death does not belong

resurrection says that what we do with our lives matters
in this body
the one that we inhabit right now
every act of compassion matters
every work of art that celebrates the good and the true matters
every fair and honest act of business and trade
every kind word
they all belong and they will all go on in God’s good world
nothing will be forgotten
nothing will be wasted
it all has it’s place

everybody believes something
everybody believes somebody
Jesus invites us to trust resurrection
that every glimmer of good
every hint of hope
every impulse that elevates the soul
is a sign, a taste, a glimpse
of how things actually are
and how things will ultimately be
resurrection affirms this life and the next
as a seamless reality
embraced
graced
and saved by God

there is an unexpected mysterious presence
who meets each of us in our lowest moments
when we have no strength when we have nothing left
and we can’t go on we hear the voice that speaks those
words

destroy this temple and I’ll rebuild it

do you believe this?
that’s the question Jesus asked then
and that’s the question he asks now

Jesus’ friends arrive at his tomb and they’re told
he isn’t here
you didn’t see that coming, did you?
he’s isn’t here
there is nothing to fear
and nothing can ever be the same again
we are living in a world in the midst of rescue
with endless unexpected possibilities

they will take my life and I will die Jesus says
but that will not be the end
and when you find yourself assuming that it’s over
when it’s lost, gone, broken and it could never be
put back together again,
when it’s been destroyed and you swear that it could never
be rebuilt

hold on a minute
because in that moment
things will in fact have just begun

© Copyright Rob Bell

LOLcat Bible Translation

February 25, 2010 — 0 Comments

From the creators of LOLCATS and iCanHasCheezBurger comes the LOLCAT Bible Translation!!!

Seriously.

But it’s actually pretty funny, and, from the portions I’ve read, it’s at least more accurate than most children’s Bibles.

More info over at ChurchCrunch.

HT: ChurchCrunch.

Mosaic Bible Drops Today

September 22, 2009 — 0 Comments

Tyndale has just released a new version of their New Living Translation titled Holy Bible: Mosaic. You can get it at Amazon right now, but if you go to their site today (Tuesday, September 22, 2009) you can also enter to win a deluxe edition!

Information

Purchase from Amazon

Giveaway

Missional Living

May 30, 2009 — 3 Comments

Life can be funny sometimes.

Or maybe I’ve just got a twisted sense of humor.

Over the last couple years I’ve come to believe that many of the things I’ve been taught to avoid and in some cases even demonize, are not in and of themselves evil. Music, alcohol, etc.

A friend of mine explained it to me this way: “America is a nation of gluttons. We do everything to excess.” And he’s right.

Sadly though, people like to pick and choose what they demonize. I know people who are quick to condemn me for having a drink, yet most doctors would consider them to be obese and last time I checked, the Bible is just as harsh towards gluttony as it is drunkenness.

And just for the record, I’ve never been drunk. Never even been buzzed. And I don’t ever plan to be either.

Anyways, ever since moving back to Louisiana, I’ve really begun to ask the question, “What is church?”.

Do I have to go to a building with “church” in the name in order to “go to church”?
Do I have to go to that building at a certain time, on a certain day?
Does there have to be a very specific order that determines what is done in “church”?
Is an online community real community?

I’m still wrestling with these questions daily, so by no means am I saying that I have all the answers. Nor am I against the traditional Protestant concept of church. I believe that church, when done right, is an awesome agent for change, discipleship and spiritual growth.

The big question I’ve been wrestling with is, have we put God into a box by putting His church in a box?

Last time I checked, the Biblical definition of a church is the regular assembly of believers for the purpose of edification and instruction. In other words, to refresh and to teach. If that is church, then I go to church every Sunday night at McAlister’s where there is a Bible study. And if online communities count, I go to LifeChurch.tv every week.

All of that brings me to this: earlier this week a friend told me that they have really begun to “question my lifestyle”, because I don’t go to (their definition of) church, I enjoy the occasional adult beverage and have been known to smoke a cigar every now and then.

Yet the funny part (funny to me) is that twice in the past two months I’ve had very deep, thought-provoking, long conversations with an unchurched friend of mine about Jesus, the Bible, church and sin, and during both conversations we enjoyed a couple cigars and some bourbon.

Thoughts?

Pulpit Peeves, pt. 3

May 10, 2009 — 1 Comment

Misquoting People or Taking Quotes Out of Context

If you are going to quote someone, please keep the quote in the correct context and don’t misquote the original author/speaker. By this I mean don’t add to the quote (putting words in someone’s mouth), don’t remove words from it (misquoting) and don’t spin it to fit your purpose (context). If the quote you are considering doesn’t work for your message in it’s original context, DON’T USE IT!!!! The same goes with scriptures; I can’t count how many times I’ve heard a great sermon that ended up being tainted because the speaker misquoted someone or took a scripture out of context and spun it to suit his need. Of course, this problem is not new. One of the primary reasons there are thousands of denominations in the Christian church is because we humans can’t agree on the proper interpretation of scriptures. So first, when you quote the Bible tell me the scripture you’re quoting. I’ll be the first to admit I don’t know every scripture in the Bible by memory, so don’t go through a whole message with statements such as “The Bible says…” or “Jesus said…”; tell me where it is in the Bible. I want to be able to read it for myself. And if you’re going to quote someone outside of scripture, provide me a reference. For example, if you quote a passage in a book, give me the name of the book, the author’s name and the page in the book. Prove to me you’ve actually read the book because it isn’t pretty when you misquote a book thinking no one in your audience has read that book when in fact, there are those who have. And they know what you’ve quoted is not accurate. I may sound harsh, but think about this: if I, as a Christian who was raised in church, don’t know the entire Bible by memory (all 31,103 verses) then how will someone who is truly unchurched respond when you quote scripture (or someone outside scripture) and don’t at least provide a reference or source material so they can check up on what they said? My pastor in Georgia (Brent Stephens) is a perfect example of this. He understands that not everyone is able to spend hours a day studying scripture, so when he quotes scripture, he does just that. He tells you exactly where to find it in the Bible. Same thing when he quotes someone outside the Bible; he gives credit to the originator of the quote and if it was from a book he tells you where and how to find it. He actually takes the time in his sermons to connect the dots so that it doesn’t matter if you’ve got a doctorate in theology or if you’re a high school dropout, you leave actually knowing more than when you came. And he isn’t the only person like this, just the first that comes to my mind (as I’m writing this at 4:00 am). Now, I’m not saying Christians should be skeptical of their pastors, but the world is. Again, drawing from personal experience, I grew up in a church culture where the speaker/pastor/evangelist’s words were gospel truth and it didn’t matter if they gave you scripture references or not. I have friends who, to this day, base their choices in life upon what their pastor says is right or wrong. An example of this is that a couple of years ago the pastor of the church I grew up in gave a message in which he claimed that drinking alcohol is a sin. At first, it was a great message because the pastor was giving scriptural reasons for not drinking (as opposed to saying the drinking is a sin). And of course he used the usual scriptures which condemn drunkenness (Proverbs 20:1, Proverbs 23:20-21, Ephesians 5:17-19, Galatians 5:20-22, Titus 1:6-8, 1 Timothy 3:2-4). Then he made the leap. I put the leap in bold italics because it was the kind of leap I thought I would only hear from Randall in Clerks. He quoted 1 Timothy 5:22-24, which says in the King James translation “Lay hands suddenly on no man, neither be partaker of other men’s sins: keep thyself pure. Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach’s sake and thine often infirmities. Some men’s sins are open beforehand, going before to judgment; and some men they follow after.” He then attempted to tie it into Leviticus 10:9 which says “Do not drink wine nor strong drink, thou, nor thy sons with thee, when ye go into the tabernacle of the congregation, lest ye die: it shall be a statute for ever throughout your generations.” One problem: he omitted the middle portion which says you aren’t to drink alcohol IN THE TABERNACLE. His interpretation of these two passages of scripture was that if you are going to drink alcohol, you can drink only alcohol and never drink anything else again (water, juice, soda, etc.), otherwise you will die. If that wasn’t bad enough, he then quoted the story of Jesus turning water into wine (John 2:9-11). Expounding upon the scriptures he said that in the ancient Greek language there are three words for our English word “wine” (which is true). The first word is defined as fermented grape juice, the second is defined as unfermented grape juice and the third can mean either/or. According to this pastor, in the ancient Greek texts of this passage the third is what is used. Fair enough…… but then he made an assumption that in my opinion is not safe to make. He asked, “Do you really believe that our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ would actually create something that has caused so much heartache and destroyed so many families?”

Just a few days later I overheard two friends arguing over what was said in that sermon. One was asking the other to show him where the Bible says drinking is a sin. The other could only respond with “Pastor says it’s a sin.” He couldn’t show anyone where the Bible says it is and he was to the point of being enraged because someone actually questioned what the pastor had said in a sermon. I know I’m coming across as harsh, but it’s because I do not take lightly the weight that a person is under when they give a message to a group of people, especially considering some of those people will be gullible enough to take what is said as gospel truth and not actually investigate the truth for themselves. I’m tired of Christians who tell me what they believe, not based upon scripture, but based upon their church or their parents. And so is the world.

Forgiveness

March 2, 2009 — 5 Comments

and forgive us our debts, as we also have forgiven our debtors.
- Matthew 6:12 (ESV)

This one verse from the Lord’s prayer sparked an interesting discussion amongst some friends last night. No one disputed the belief that if you are unable to forgive others God is unable to forgive you. But at the end of the evening we were left with an interesting question: Can you forgive someone without approaching them and doing it face to face?

As we went around the table, the answers ranged from “No, you have to contact them somehow, someway, unless they’re dead.” to a simple “yes”.

So we were told to investigate the scriptures for ourselves and come back the following Sunday evening with our answers and the scriptures to support those answers.

Needless to say, I’ve been doing a bit of research. I’m of the opinion that the best practice in most situations is to go to the person (or at least contact them) and let them know you’ve forgiven them, but that there are some situations where that just isn’t ideal. Situations that would do more harm than good.

And yes, I’ve got scriptures to support my position.

But I wanted to open this up to those who come across my blog.

What are your thoughts?

Why?